PHIL 201 Study Guide Lesson 19 Revelation

PHIL 201 Study Guide Lesson 19 Revelation and the Possibility of Miracles
Study Guide Lesson 19: Revelation and the Possibility of Miracles

Points:

Check your essay before you submit. See exactly what your professor sees.

See your AI and plagiarism results before your instructor does.Get the exact same report your professor uses. Trusted by 50,000+ students worldwide.

Get Plagiarism Report Humanize My Essay

Four ways that special revelation is connected with miracles:
Explain the correct understanding of the traditional view of revelation:
What were the two 18th century developments contributed to the liberal view of revelation + How did these two support each other:
In what sense is the nonpropositional view a compromise between the other two views:
Three arguments in favor of the traditional view:
Hume’s definition of a miracle and common objections to it: Definition:
Hume’s two arguments against believing in miracles (Note: Hume is not saying miracles are impossible, just that we have no reason ever to believe in one):
Two criticisms related to Hume’s first argument:
Hume’s misuse of probability:
Problems with Hume’s second argument:
The “no-laws-of-nature” criticism and Evans’s response: Criticism:
Nowell-Smith’s “explanatory argument” and Evans’s response: Argument:
Criteria involved in recognizing an event as a miracle
What is the relationship between revelation and authority:

Terms:
Natural Revelation
Special Revelation
The Traditional View
Propositional View
Inerrancy
The Liberal View
Enlightenment Rationalism
Higher-Criticism
The Nonpropositional View
Miracle