NURSING LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT FIELD EXPERIENCE

NURSING LEADERSHIP & MANAGEMENT FIELD EXPERIENCE

Competencies:
7018.1.1: Communication and Building Relationships – The graduate utilizes effective communication and relationship-building practices at all levels of interaction in the healthcare environment.
7018.1.2: Knowledge of the Healthcare Environment – The graduate utilizes public and organizational policies, nursing standards, evidence from research for best practice, and quality improvement to evaluate and improve the healthcare environment.
7018.1.3: Leadership – The graduate demonstrates a leadership role by effectively designing and implementing patient safety and quality improvement initiatives within the context of transprofessional care guided by evidence for best practice.
7018.1.4: Collaboration – The graduate effectively designs and implements a contemporary, organizationally relevant initiative within the context of transprofessional care.
7018.1.5: Organizational Business Administration – The graduate designs plans to implement appropriate business practices within a healthcare organization.
Introduction:
You will design and develop an evidenced-based practice change, quality improvement, or innovation that demonstrates the synthesis of WGU graduate competencies. This project is not primary research, but should be focused on scholarly evidence in support of practice improvements, innovation, or general practice change. It will not require an Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval. You will be required to conduct a comprehensive literature review that defines the evidence in support of your project. The literature review represents a collection of primary research studies that have already been conducted and that provide guidance for best practices. Once your project plan is complete, you will create a professional presentation that outlines your plan, and then present it to your stakeholder group and preceptor.

Check your essay before you submit. See exactly what your professor sees.

See your AI and plagiarism results before your instructor does.Get the exact same report your professor uses. Trusted by 50,000+ students worldwide.

Get Plagiarism Report Humanize My Essay

Before you start your project, you will first need to secure organizational approval and obtain a letter of agreement from your preceptor. In Task 1, you will be required to develop a plan for your capstone project that describes your problem and proposed solution.

Requirements

A. Submit a signed approval letter from the organization where your project will be conducted using the attached Organizational Approval Letter Template.

B. Submit a signed copy of the attached Preceptor Agreement.

C. Summarize your project by doing the following:

1. Identify the problem.

2. Describe why the problem you have identified requires a practice change, quality improvement, or innovation.

3. Explain the causes of the problem.

4. Identify the stakeholders.

a. Discuss each stakeholder’s interest, power, and influence in relation to the project.

D. Explain the purpose of your project.

E. Explain your proposed solution for your project.

F. Provide an evidence summary to support your proposed change.

1. Provide a reference list for your evidence summary in APA format that includes a minimum of five scholarly, peer-reviewed sources that were published within the last five years.

G. Explain your proposed implementation plan, which includes the following:

1. Plan of action

2. Timeline

3. Needed resources and personnel

4. Proposed change theory

5. Barriers to implementation

H. When you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.

Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.

Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in an assessment, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the assessment.

Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from outside sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the APA Guidelines section.
File Attachments:
1. Field Experience Preceptor Agreement Form Examplelink opens in new window

2. Field Experience Preceptor Agreement Form Instructionslink opens in new window

3. Field Experience Preceptor Agreement Form Templatelink opens in new window

4. Organizational Approval Instructionslink opens in new window

5. Organizational Approval Letter Examplelink opens in new window

6. Organizational Approval Letter Templatelink opens in new window

7. Task 1 Templatelink opens in new window

8. Task 1 Template Instructionslink opens in new window
Click to Show/Hide Method
Evaluation Method
Export to Word link opens in new window
value: 0.00

value: 1.00

value: 2.00

value: 3.00

value: 4.00

Score/Level
Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)
The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. The candidate provides weak articulation of response. The candidate provides limited articulation of response. The candidate provides adequate articulation of response. The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.
A. Organizational Approval Letter Template
The candidate does not provide a signed approval letter from the organization where the project will be conducted using the attached Organizational Approval Letter Template. Not applicable. Not applicable. Not applicable. The candidate provides a signed approval letter from the organization where the project will be conducted using the attached Organizational Approval Letter Template.
B. Preceptor Agreement
The candidate does not provide a signed copy of the attached Preceptor Agreement. Not applicable. Not applicable. Not applicable. The candidate provides a signed copy of the attached Preceptor Agreement.
C1. Problem Identification
The candidate does not identify the problem. Not applicable. The candidate appropriately identifies the problem, with insufficient detail. Not applicable. The candidate appropriately identifies the problem, with sufficient detail.
C2. Change, Quality Improvement, or Innovation
The candidate does not provide an appropriate description of why the identified problem requires a practice change, quality improvement, or innovation. Not applicable. The candidate provides an appropriate description, with insufficient detail, of why the identified problem requires a practice change, quality improvement, or innovation. Not applicable. The candidate provides an appropriate description, with sufficient detail, of why the identified problem requires a practice change, quality improvement, or innovation.
C3. Causes of the Problem
The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of the causes of the problem. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of the causes of the problem. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of the causes of the problem. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of the causes of the problem. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of the causes of the problem.
C4. Identification of Stakeholders
The candidate does not identify the stakeholders. Not applicable. Not applicable. Not applicable. The candidate identifies the stakeholders.
C4a. Interest, Power, and Influence of Stakeholders
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of each stakeholder’s interest, power, and influence in relation to the project. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of each stakeholder’s interest, power, and influence in relation to the project. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of each stakeholder’s interest, power, and influence in relation to the project. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of each stakeholder’s interest, power, and influence in relation to the project. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of each stakeholder’s interest, power, and influence in relation to the project.
D. Purpose of Project
The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of the purpose of the project. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of the purpose of the project. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of the purpose of the project. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of the purpose of the project. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of the purpose of the project.
E. Proposed Solution
The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of the proposed solution for the project. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no detail, of the proposed solution for the project. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited detail, of the proposed solution for the project. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate detail, of the proposed solution for the project. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial detail, of the proposed solution for the project.
F. Evidence Summary
The candidate does not provide an appropriate evidence summary to support the proposed change. The candidate provides an appropriate evidence summary, with no detail, to support the proposed change. The candidate provides an appropriate evidence summary, with limited detail, to support the proposed change. The candidate provides an appropriate evidence summary, with adequate detail, to support the proposed change. The candidate provides an appropriate evidence summary, with substantial detail, to support the proposed change.
F1. Peer-Reviewed Sources
The candidate does not provide a reference list for the evidence summary in APA format. Not applicable. The candidate provides a reference list for the evidence summary in APA format that includes 1�4 scholarly, peer-reviewed sources that were published within the last five years. Not applicable. The candidate provides a reference list for the evidence summary in APA format that includes 5 scholarly, peer-reviewed sources that were published within the last five years.
G1. Plan of Action
The candidate does not include an appropriate plan of action in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes an appropriate plan of action, with no detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes an appropriate plan of action, with limited detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes an appropriate plan of action, with adequate detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes an appropriate plan of action, with substantial detail, in the proposed implementation plan.
G2. Timeline
The candidate does not include an appropriate timeline in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes an appropriate timeline, with no detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes an appropriate timeline, with limited detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes an appropriate timeline, with adequate detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes an appropriate timeline, with substantial detail, in the proposed implementation plan.
G3. Resources and Personnel
The candidate does not include needed resources and personnel in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes needed resources and personnel, with no detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes needed resources and personnel, with limited detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes needed resources and personnel, with adequate detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes needed resources and personnel, with substantial detail, in the proposed implementation plan.
G4. Proposed Change Theory
The candidate does not include a proposed change theory in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes a proposed change theory, with no detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes a proposed change theory, with limited detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes a proposed change theory, with adequate detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes a proposed change theory, with substantial detail, in the proposed implementation plan.
G5. Barriers to Implementation
The candidate does not include any barriers to implementation in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes barriers to implementation, with no detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes barriers to implementation, with limited detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes barriers to implementation, with adequate detail, in the proposed implementation plan. The candidate includes barriers to implementation, with substantial detail, in the proposed implementation plan.
H. Sources
When the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text citations and references. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides only some in-text citations and references. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with major deviations from APA style. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with minor deviations from APA style. When the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR the candidate does

Below is the rubric