Mickey Mantle received a liver transplant in 1995

Mickey Mantle received a liver transplant in 1995. He was a Baseball Hall of Fame center fielder for the New York Yankees whose liver was failing because of cirrhosis and hepatitis. Although the waiting period for a liver transplant in the United States is about 130 days, it took only two days for the Baylor Medical Center’s transplant team to find an organ donor for the 63-year-old former baseball hero.

According to the director of the Southwest Organ Bank, Mantle was moved ahead of others on the list because of his deteriorating medical condition; however, there were mixed feelings about speeding up the process for a celebrity. Mantle was known for overcoming immense obstacles, and many argued that the medical system should provide exceptions for heroes. He was also a recovering alcoholic, which further complicated the ethical implications of the case. Because of Mantle’s medical problems, doctors estimated that he had only a 60 percent chance for a three-year survival; whereas, liver transplant patients typically have about a 78 percent chance for a three-year survival rate.

Check your essay before you submit. See exactly what your professor sees.

See your AI and plagiarism results before your instructor does.Get the exact same report your professor uses. Trusted by 50,000+ students worldwide.

Get Plagiarism Report Humanize My Essay

As in the case of the liver transplant for Mickey Mantle, should the system make exceptions for real heroes? Why or why not?

Support your comments by citing at least 3-acadaemic sources.

Write a paper, using APA format, of at least 1050 words in which you analyze the Mickey Mantle case using the Seven-Step Decision Model.

Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.

Grading Criteria

Biomedical Example

Content

Points Available

9

Points Earned

Additional Comments:

The student properly analyzed the case presented using the Seven-Step Decision Model:

1. Determined the facts

2. Defined the precise ethical issue

3. Identified the major principles, rules, and values

4. Specified the alternatives

5. Compared values and alternatives

6. Assessed the consequences

7. Determined the appropriate decision that should have been made

Content is supported by the inclusion of at least 3-academic sources.

Organization/Development

Points Available

3

Points Earned

Additional Comments:

· The paper is at least 1,050 words.

· The introduction provides sufficient background on the topic and previews major points.

· The conclusion is logical, flows, and reviews the major points.

Mechanics

Points Available

3

Points Earned

Additional Comments:

· The paper—includes document headings, title page, and reference page— is consistent with APA formatting guidelines and meets requirements.

· Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page.

· The paper is laid out with effective use of headings, font styles, and white space.

· Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.

Total Available

Total Earned

15