Applying the agenda setting and policy analysis on the Australian housing policy custom essay

Applying the agenda setting and policy analysis on the Australian housing policy custom essay

I want 500 words essay plan and the requirement is written down after the lecturer see the plan and approve it I will ask you the again to write the 3000 words essay
The major component of the assessment for the topic is an analytical essay in
which you apply concepts, theories and ideas covered in the topic to an
analysis of two public policy areas or issues that seem to reflect different
concepts of policy and different methods of decision-making. The areas or
issues can be chosen either broadly or more specifically – for example, at the
broad level, trade, housing, welfare, education or health policy in different
jurisdictions, or at the more specific level, issues like the impact of free-trade
policy in particular economic sectors; social inclusion policy and its impact in
different policy arenas; or questions of payment and fees for higher education
in different countries.
” I prefer to have housing area in Australia ”

Check your essay before you submit. See exactly what your professor sees.

See your AI and plagiarism results before your instructor does.Get the exact same report your professor uses. Trusted by 50,000+ students worldwide.

Get Plagiarism Report Humanize My Essay

The essential task is for you to compare and contrast the factors underlying
the differences between the two areas or issues that you have chosen to
analyse. In your analysis, you are required to discuss and analyse relevant
public policy concepts, models, theories and methods covered in the topic in
the areas of agenda setting, decision making, policy analysis or policy tools
which appear to best explain and account for the differences. An overall
analysis and argument in terms of the themes, issues, and approaches
developed in the topic is required. A key question guiding your writing should
be – which ideas, models and policy approaches examined in the topic appear
best to account for developments in the policy areas and issues you are
investigating and why?
MODULE 1: AGENDA SETTING & THE FORMATION OF
PUBLIC POLICY
This module includes units explaining the mechanisms though which policy
agendas are set and change.
LECTURE : AGENDA SETTING: GENERAL PERSPECTIVES
This lecture provides an account of where policy issues and ideas come from,
and who sets policy agendas. External and internal drivers of policy, and who
steers them are explored. Some models and case studies of agenda setting are
examined.
References

Althaus, C., Bridgman, P. & Davis, G. 2007. The Australian Policy Handbook,
4th edition, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, Chpt. 4 ‘Identifying Issues’, pp. 43-
56.
* Edwards, M., 2001, ‘Paying for a university education: HECS and not fees’, in
Edwards, M., Social Policy, Public Policy: From problem to practice,
Allen & Unwin, Sydney.
Hill, M. 2009. The Public Policy Process, 5th edition, Chpt 8, ‘Agenda setting’,
pp. 150-70.

LECTURE : COORDINATION – PROBLEM & RESPONSE
This lecture examines of the impact of bureaucracy on the agenda setting and
policy-making processes and the related problems of coordination. Two key
common problems face all large organisations – coordination and integration –
or the alignment of cultures and structures of authority to fit critical tasks
that cut across organisational boundaries. Recent ideas about joined-up
government and whole-of-government responses to these problems are
explored. How such approaches work in practice will be explored.

References
Althaus, C., Bridgman, P. & Davis, G. 2007. The Australian Policy Handbook,
4th edition, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, Chpt 8 ‘Coordination, pp. 124-143.
* Hood, C., 2005, ‘The Idea of Joined-Up Government: A Historical
Perspective’, in Bogdanor, V. (ed), Joined-Up Government, Oxford
University Press.
* Mulgan, G., 2005 ‘Joined up government: past, present and future’, in
Bogdanor, V. (ed), Joined-Up Government, Oxford University Press.
* Peters, B.G., 1998, ‘Managing horizontal government: the politics of
coordination’, Public Administration, 76, pp. 295-311.
* Shergold, P., 2004, ‘Connecting Government: Whole of Government
Responses to Australia’s Priority Challenges’, Canberra Bulletin of
Public Administration, No. 112, pp. 11-14.

LECTURE: POLICY NETWORKS
This lecture examines different understandings of policy communities and
policy networks and the ways in which they explain the formation of public
policy. The debate about the advantages and disadvantages of these models
are also examined.
9
References
* Börzel, T.A. 1998. ‘Organizing Babylon – On the Different Conceptions of
Policy Networks’, Public Administration, 76, Summer, pp. 253-73.
* Dowding, K. 1995. ‘Model or Metaphor? A Critical Review of the Policy
Network Approach’, Political Studies, XLIII, pp. 136-58.
Hill, M. 2009. The Public Policy Process, 5th edition, Chpt 3, ‘From Pluralism
to Networks’, pp. 53-66.
* Peters, B.G. 2000. ‘Managing Cross-Cutting Issues’, Excerpt from Building
Policy Coherence: Tools and Tensions, [Online accessed 28/02/01]
Available http://www.oecd.org/puma/strat/managing
MODULE : POLICY ANALYSIS
This module includes units on different techniques of policy analysis and
examines the assumptions upon which they are based.
LECTURE : POLICY ANALYSIS & RATIONALITY
This lecture examines of comprehensive and incremental models of policy
analysis and rationality with an account of how these models help understand
the rationality of Australian policy making. In particular, the sources and
impediments to rational policy development in the Australian setting are
explored.
References
Althaus, C., Bridgman, P. & Davis, G. 2007. The Australian Policy Handbook,
4th edition, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, Chpt. 5 ‘Policy Analysis’, pp. 57-85.
* Ham, C. and Hill, M. 1993. ‘Rationality and Decision-Making’, Chpt 5 in The
Policy Process in the Modern Capitalist State, 2nd ed. Harvester
Wheatsheaf, Herfordshire UK, pp. 80-96.
* Mayer, I.S., van Daalen, C.E. & Bots, P.W.G. 2004. ‘Perspectives on policy
analyses: a framework for understanding and design’, International
Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 4, 2. pp. 169-91.
10
LECTURE : COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
This lecture provides an account of the main aspects of cost-benefit analysis
(CBA), in particular the main issues raised at each step of the CBA process.
Issues and lessons emerging from various examples of the application of CBA
are examined.
References
* Bureau of Transport Economics. ‘Fact and Furphies in Benefit-Cost Analysis:
Transport’, Chapter 1. [Online accessed 8/6/01] Available
http://www.dotrs.gov.au/btre/index.htm
* Frank, R.H. 2000. ‘Why is cost-benefit analysis so controversial?’, Journal of
Legal Studies, 29, pp. 913-30.
* Sen, A., 2000. ‘The discipline of cost-benefit analysis’, Journal of Legal
Studies, 29, pp. 931-952.
* Wills, I. 1997. ‘Cost-benefit analysis of environmental changes’, chpt 10 in
Economics and the Environment, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, pp. 132-44.

LECTURE : QUALITATIVE POLICY ANALYSIS & EVALUATION
This lecture examines of various qualitative techniques of policy analysis and
evaluation building on and reacting to earlier ideas of rationality based on
quantitative measurement. Impact assessment, strategic management and
collaborative-adaptive techniques of policy analysis and evaluation are
examined.
11
References
Althaus, C., Bridgman, P. & Davis, G. 2007. The Australian Policy Handbook,
4th edition, Allen & Unwin, Sydney, Chpt. 5 ‘Policy Analysis’, pp. 57-85
& Chpt. 11 ‘Evaluation’, pp. 179-190.
* Nutley, S., Davies, H. and Walter, I. 2003. ‘Evidence-Based Policy and
Practice: Cross-Sector Lessons from the United Kingdom, Social Policy
Journal of New Zealand, Issue 20, pp. 29-48
* Sanderson, I. 2002. ‘Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence-Based Policy
Making’, Public Administration, 80, 1, pp. 1-22.
* Marston, G. and Watts, R. 2003. ‘Tampering with the Evidence: A Critical
Appraisal of Evidence-based Policy-Making’, The Drawing Broad: An
Australian Review of Public Affairs, 3, 3, pp. 143-63.